| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.

View
 

Early Germans vs Early Imperial Romans

Page history last edited by Rob Brennan 12 years ago

> Over the bank holiday weekend I played two games of DBMM.

>

> The first was a doubles game with myself and Tom Fox playing 500pts

> of Early Germans and Chris Jolley and Neil Fox using the Early

> Imperial Romans.

>

> Four pieces of Difficult going, two of which were on hills scattered

> on the table. Three on the Roman side.

>

> The German warbands were all fast. The center command had the C-in-C

> with 49 Warband. 9 defended the baggage behind TF. The other 40

> deployed 4 ranks deep against the 2 Psiloi in the Marsh.

>

> On the right flank there were 18 warband, 3 ranks deep with 8 Roman

> deserters (Aux (S)). A general, a cavalry and a couple of

> skirmishers. On the left Tom commanded 18 warband, 8 Roman deserters,

> 8 German cavalry and loads of skirmishers. Enough Ps to give support

> and some archers.

>

> The barbarians took a baggage command at the rear. The middle command

> had 10 Blades (6 Supperior, 4 ordinary) and the 2 skirmishers in the

> marsh. On their left they took a mixed command of blades in the open

> and Aux(S) on the hill with difficult going. Some Psioloi and cavalry

> were mincing about too.

>

> On the right the Romans had their strike force. 7 or 8 Aux partially

> in the difficult going (on another hill). About 8 cavalry, 4

> Numidians, 4 Fast artillery and the mounted general.

>

> The men wearing trousers came forward as fast as they could. On their

> right the ones with skirts pulled their Aux in the open back. They

> would have retreated with the ones on hill but they were in difficult

> going and would have to move as individual elements. They held their

> ground as the mounted part of the command moved around the hill and

> tried to outflank the German left.

>

> The Germans expanded their column of cavalry on the left flank and

> sent their skirt wearers against the Romans. On the right the massive

> numeric superiority was beginning to tell. In the center the warband

> entered the marsh, mainly impetously and moved towards the

> skirmishers.

>

> On the right the Romans brought their fast artillery out to support

> the falnk of their cavalry.

>

> On the Germans right they made contact with the legions with overlaps

> on both flanks. Took 6 legions off in one go. They lost a few combats

> to the Aux as they couldn't count their rear rank support and the Aux

> were uphill. Numbers counted though and the Aux took losses due to

> being outflanked and a couple of naked blokes fighting for the Romans

> died after being taken in the rear.

>

> In the center the 2 skirmishers eventually died but prevented the

> bulk of the warband making contact with the Superior legions who just

> pissed about most of the game shitting themselves.

>

> On the German left, as half the Aux ran away the 8 skirt weares were

> easily able to over come the 3 or 4 who couldn't get out of the way.

> The artillery were charged and destroyed by Toms charge with his

> cavalry. No losses from the artillery. The cavalry chared each other

> and the Romans lost one or two elelments.

>

> Two commands demorilised and the army broke. The blokes wearing

> trousers lost 7.5 out of over a hundred. 25-0.

>

> I felt the interactions worked pretty much as I expected and similair

> to DBM. If the warbands can make contact with the legions in a

> straight line and with overlaps they will beat them easily. If the

> warbands have to fight superior auxilia in terrain of their choice

> they will make no headway and will take losses. Their only chance is

> to attack their flanks with superior numbers. Warband get slowed down

> big time by difficult terrain. Fast artillery in the right place can

> help win a game but in the erong place can lose it.

>

> Neil and Tom play DBM 3.1 and it was their first game of DBMM. Neil

> felt it was a bit easy getting the terrain they wanted. I think they

> were a bit lucky getting two hills with diffiuclt going pretty much

> where they wanted. They were suprised how quick the combat went,

> with the game being decided by about 3 pairs of bounds. They both

> seemed to enjoy the game though

>

> I was amused by the fact Chris got his arse kicked by someone less

> than a third of his age who had never played DBMM before. Kept me

> amused all weakend!

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.