It was a dark and windy day....in Upper Hut...gale force forecast not
far from here and it was certainly blowing outside with grey clouds.. :)
The battle was set - could the local Carthaginians match Hannibal's genius?
The Romans "set up first", Hannibal 2nd...Rome took the 1st move...the
PIPs were 0, 1, 0 and 3 (fron left to right low (Varro), high, 2nd, ally
(Paulus) were an immediate warning of what we could expect.
But we didn't have to wait long for the action - Carthage got 6, 6, 4
and 4, with their cavalry wings getting the 2 highest dice and the
infantry centres averaging the low ones.
It only took to turn 2 for the Gallic and Iberian cavalry to smash into
the Roman cavalry, and instantly they killed an element, creating the
dreaded gap...
But for some reason the carthaginian plyer there didn't exploit it on
turn 3 - maybe it was only getting 2 PIPs?
In the centre the Punic skirmishers and the first line of Gauls advanced
to attack the Roman light screen - which struggled to retire through the
legions behind them - the formations were so deep and dense that all
sorts of moves had to be tried to get the light troops out of hteway
(basically they advanced with 2 ranks of blades to create a gap into
which they could retire) - much of the Roman PIP resource was spent
trying to bring the heavy infantry forward through the obstacle of their
own light troops! They may have been better off just fighting with them!!
On the Roman left Varro had 0, 1, 0 PIPs for the first 3 turns, and the
Numidans (with 6, 3 and 6 PIPs) promptly marched outside their flank and
lines up on the end of the more-or-less stationary Italian allied cavalry.
Contact was made between the advancing Gauls and the Roman centre on T4,
but the Italian cavalry got 4 PIPs that turn, and turned on thir
tormentors - advancing a line towards the main body of Numidians and
telling off some elements to cover their flank - but they didn't
actually kill anything.
The Roman cavalry was crumbling fast on the right....right up until the
bit where Hasdrubal got himself killed (T6)!! Over confident in his
numbers he had fought in the front rank and pursued too fat - finding
himself isolated and flanked! Oops.
However numbers and hte gaps did tell, and that was the end of the
successes for the Roman right flank as the African spearmen came up onto
the outside of hte Roman infantry....
With 2, 3 and 2 PIPs on turns 5, 6 and 7 Varro was positively racing
around the table on the left - and even managed to kill a few
Numidians.....but early casualties meant the Italians were outnumbered
in elements, and excrebal PIPs vs great ones for the light horsement
(1,1,1 T8-10 vs 5, 6, 6) meant the Italians were essentially sitting
ducks - they won a few combats, survived a few occasions being lapped
around, but were being whittled down without being able to respond.
In the middle the Roman infantry pushed forward. Gallic casualties were
mounting, but only a couple of handfuls so far...
On the right Paulus's infantry tried to turn outwards to face the
victorious mercenary cavalry and the African spearmen....tbut he newly
raised legions proved no match for the veterans, and by T10 Paulus'
command was disheartened. By the end of T11 it broke, and T14 it was
shattered and fled the table in disorder, followed by such Gallic and
Iberian cavalry who were close enough to get impetuous pursuit and who
were not controlled.
They had inflicted casualties on the Africans tho - especially where the
Carthaginians had carelessly not covered a flank properly and were
lapped by some Principes using that well known Roman manouvre the 80p
slidus......:)
In the centre the Romans were pressing forward and Gallic casualties
were mounting....it was fairly obvious the Gauls were going to be broken
through right in the middle....advancing them early in the game had just
bought them closer to the Romans and given them more time to be killed -
not a good move.
With a few Sp(S) dead the left wing of the Carthaginian infantry was
getting close to being disheartened, and at one point Hannibal even
throw his own bodyguard into the fray, attacking directly at the
pro-consul ...but he achieved nothing of note (2 brilliant strokes as
+2's in combat vs the Roman general....)
Back on the left....with the Roman right wing broken it was now a race
to see if the Roman left would break before the Carthaginian infantry...
The Numidians all but cleared out the Italian cavalry, but the African
spearmen found them much harder (lost 2 elements to 6-1's at 3:3!) - the
last 4 elements of Italian cavalry, incl Varro's own Extraordinarii
(thought I'd get that in... :)) simple refused to roll low...
On T13 Hannibal's infantry became disheartened......on T14 Mago's
infantry became disheartened....by this time the centre of Gauls had
completely disappeared...the Numidians had closed on all sides of Varro
and his bodyguards...but inspired by the Consul the Itialians forced the
lighter horsemen to retire time after time.
More Numidians arrived to harrass the rear of the Roman left...but all
this time Gauls were being cut down in the middle...the 2 pro-consuls
had turned many of their troops towards the flanks and were "running
down" the line....
Adn so to the final turn...T16.....both Carthaginian infantry commands
were within 1 element of breaking, ht Numidians were attacking the rear
ranks of the Roman left (ie the Triarii Sp(S)), Varro was
surrounded...again...and his raw legionaries were being attacked in the
front by Hanno, and in the flank (Bd (I) forvced to turn) and rear
(Sp(S) that couldn't turn) by Numidians.
But hey...it's jsut a game of dice....:)
So the final round of combat in the Carthaginian turn - Hanno killed the
Bd facing him....but the Carthaginians couldn't buy another victory
anywher - the Triarii turned and faced the Numidians, refusing to give
in to panic; Varro's Italians finally caught some of the nimble
horsemen coming too close and killed many who were unable to get away
(ie he killed the element facing), and in the centre the Romans wiped
out some more of Hannibal's Gauls - so Hannibal's own command broke, and
the 2 ME penalty for seeing tht broke the other infantry command - Game
over, and Rome wins the day!
ANALYSIS (some thoughts)
As Varro having a death of PIPs was unbelievably frustrating - most of
the time all I could do was try to get the general out of danger - half
hte time when I did have 1 PIP he was stuck in close combat and couldn't
move any troops anyway!
A better PIP allocation system may have been to average the 3 eligible
Roman commands - this would haev given Varro extra PIPs at the expense
of the 2 central commands - but they also had their generals' PIPs which
they used often to get into combat.
In this case the Roman psiloi would probably have had to fight rather
than attempt to withdraw.
The Carthaginians made several mistakes IMO:
1/ Advancing the gauls - no need to do this - the longer it takes for
the Romans to get to them the better, and a couple more turns delay
before it happened would have seen the Carthaginians probably win.
2/ Fighting with Hasdrubal - unlucky dice in some respects, but there
was never any need for his extra factor
Both of htese I put down to them being a bit impatient to get into
contact and not fully realising that they needed to accomplish some
things in order - ie FIRST clear away the Roman cavalry wings....THEN do
the infantry fight...
You may notice three's no mention of the Iberian infantry - that's
because they only fought a couple of times right at the end of the game.
They had been set up on the flanks of the Gauls and not been advanced
with the Spearmen - so they only barely made it into combat with the
remnants of Paulus's army on the Roman left, and not at all on the right.
THE SEQUEL (ie how history changed....)
With most of their cavalry intact the remnants of the Carthaginian army
were able to gather back at their camp - with Varro's urging, Paulus
offered battle again the next day, but Hannibal refused, then slipped
away that night, leaving his wounded to be slaughtered by the vengeful
Romans.
Terrentius Varro was aclaimed as the Saviour of Rome, and Fabius Maximus
was reviled for having spent a year withiout inflicting any defeat on
Hannibal.
Hannibal could not stay in southern Italy - no Italian cities rebelled
agaisnt Rome, and he was forced to retreat back to Cisalpine Gaul for
supplies. But even there the carnage among his gallic troops had made
him unpopular.
A year later Varro was ambushed by Hannibal while marching without
proper scouts in northern Italy, but the revenge gave only temporary
relief, and Hannibal was forced to make a long and arduous reverse
passage through the alps and return to Spain.
While there, his star seriously diminished and his troops exhausted,
demoralised and many fewer than had left, he was defeated by the
otherwise little known Roman general Publius Cornelius Scipio - Carthage
was forced from Spain, and the 2nd Punic War was ended on terms of
Carthage losing all its territories outside Africa, having its fleet
limited to 30 Triremes, and having to pay Rome a massive tribute for the
next 50 years.
Just 23 years later the Carthaginians had had enough of this and went to
war with Rome again - some say Hannibal was the chief instigator, but it
was of no import - Carthage no longer had the resourcs to fight and had
timed it's declaration badly - Rome had defeated Macedonia and Seleucia
in recent wars and neither was able to offer more than encouragement -
although both did declare war. After several years desultory fighting
in Africa, Rome sent Lucius Aemilius Paulus to command - son of one of
the consuls at Cannae. He invested Carthage, and after a seige of 2
years accepted its surrender, sold it's peoiple into slavery and
destroyed the city forever.
So nothing really changed....:)
Mark Pickup adds:
It is generally the case that history is written by the victor, so as the
loosing Carthaginian commander in Mike Campbell’s recent report I feel
history would benefit from the Carthaginian point of view. Even if I was
only present in the flesh at the very beginning and end of the battle as an
unexpected family crisis took me away from the field of battle for the
middle 2 ½ hours.
Cannae is a difficult battle for the Carthaginian to win unless the Roman
player is handicapped in some manner, as in a straight up fight the roman
strength is greatly superior to the Carthaginian.
Naively I had assumed the four legions would advance, as per history, in a
block. What the Roman battle report does not make clear is that the centre
two legions advanced, while the inferior legions remained back on or near
the baseline and fought partially against the Carthaginian cavalry wings.
The two central roman commands as they advanced split from being a single
block to a line three deep of blade that advanced on the Gauls, while an
inner line formed to guard and fight on their now exposed outer flank and a
rear line of Sp(s) remained in rear support with the withdrawn velites.
In an attempt to limit roman movement options Mike devised that the Romans
would have an inert CinC. This use of an inert commander along with
assigning low dice to the flank commands, perversely worked significantly to
the Romans advantage as these more vulnerable troops remained close to the
baseline starting position further away from the better Carthaginian troops
the Spanish Bd(F)( and African Sp(s) that were intended in the Cath plan to
destroy them
The Roman advance that effectively became a blunt arrowhead was a good
wargaming tactic to counter the historical Carthaginian deployment. It
concentrated the good Romans on a limited frontage of Gauls ensuring overlap
and a steady kill rate for minimal loss and kept the two vulnerable legions
at the back making it difficult for the Carthaginian to attack them
frontally due to the distance to be covered and made them virtually
impossible to reach in the flank.
While the Carthaginian forward movement of (some) Gauls for a single move
did not in the final analysis help their cause, this advance was never
intended to be permanent, but was intended to be an enticement for the Roman
to advance, followed by a group retire of Reg Aux(O) when the Romans
approached closer. This retirement failed when the two PIP throws in a row,
failed to provide enough PIP’s (2) for the group retirement. In my view the
withholding of the roman flank legions created the far more serious
departure from the Cannae script which made it harder for the Carthaginian
plan to bear fruit.
Another contributing issue is the composition of the commands. Each army was
divided into four commands.
The Romans had two central good legions allocated high pip dice. The roman
flank legions had the cavalry allocated to them. Allocating the roman
cavalry to the flank infantry command, meant that the quick historic result
of a rout of the roman cav stripping the flanks of the legion could not
occur, instead the combined legion and cavalry command had to be defeated.
The Carthaginians managed this on one flank (inadvertently loosing a general
in the process) but could not manage it on the other. The loss of the
general proved critical as it meant that the victorious Carthaginian cav
command was not able to successfully redeploy as it did historically. I
believe the Romans would have worked better (more historically) as 6
commands (with a house rule to allow 6), each cav command separate and the 4
legions separate, with the legions required to average pips across all four
commands.
The Carthaginians were also divided into four commands. They were deployed
as many believe the historical dispositions of the Gauls pushed forward in a
crescent, and the Africans held back at the tip of the crescent wings. The
Carthaginian cav were each separate commands, and the infantry was divided
evenly into two commands. The problem the Carthaginians faced in the
structure devised by Mike was that the size of the two infantry commands
were too big to redeploy from the historical dispositions we started in into
a better formation once the Romans deviated from the Cannae script on move
one by attacking in a blunt arrowhead with refused flanks. To respond to
this we needed to push the Africans and blade forward while simultaneously
pulling the Gauls back into a single line. Simple in theory but proved
impossible in practice with two commands allocated the average of the low
pip dice. I believe the Carthaginian would have worked better if the
Africans were made into separate spear commands, yielding again 6 commands.
Unfortunately we were using the command structure devised by the perfidious
Roman organizer of the game. We Carthaginians refer to this as Roman
treachery.
I see we missed that the inert Roman general should have moved second. Roman
treachery again! Interestingly, if the Carthaginian had moved first our
Psiloi would probably have advanced/marched into contact pinning the Roman
Velites for a possibly more accurate historical start to the battle.
One lesson I drew from this game are that large historical simulations like
this should not overly restrict the players by forcing commands that are too
large, as PIP limitations will become decisive. In this game on both sides
it was the high pip commands that out manourvered and defeated low pip
commands.
regards
Mark Pickup
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.